Alzheimer's & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer's Association
Volume 4, Issue 1 , Pages 14-21, January 2008

Practicality of a computerized system for cognitive assessment in the elderly

  • Howard M. Fillit

      Affiliations

    • Institute for the Study of Aging, Inc, New York, NY, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: 212-935-2402; Fax: 212-935-2408.
  • ,
  • Ely S. Simon

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Science, NeuroTrax Corporation, Newark, NJ, USA
    • Center for Neurosciences, The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System, Manhasset, NY, USA
  • ,
  • Glen M. Doniger

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Science, NeuroTrax Corporation, Newark, NJ, USA
  • ,
  • Jeffrey L. Cummings

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurology, Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Abstract 

Background

Early detection and diagnosis are critical to dementia care. However, many early cases remain undiagnosed as a result of the impracticality of neuropsychological testing, particularly in primary care. Mindstreams is an office-based computerized system for measuring cognitive function in multiple domains, with demonstrated validity, test-retest reliability, and sensitivity to treatment effects. This study evaluated its feasibility for assessment of the elderly.

Methods

Usability data were collected after each of 2,888 consecutive initial-visit testing sessions at the first 11 clinical centers to use Mindstreams. The χ2 goodness-of-fit test was employed to determine whether patients and supervisors more often rated tests easy versus hard to use. Separate analyses were run for non–computer users, patients older than 75 years, and poor performers (≤1 standard deviation on overall battery performance).

Results

For all patients (n = 2,888; age, 64.7 ± 18.2 years), 83% rated the tests easy to use (P < .001). Seventy-three percent of non–computer users, 70% of patients older than 75, and 69% of poor performers rated them easy to use (Ps < .001). Supervisor ratings and ease of understandability ratings were similar. For all patients, 76% of supervisor ratings indicated no patient frustration (P < .001). Seventy-eight percent of ratings for non–computer users, 76% for patients older than 75, and 74% for poor performers indicated no frustration (Ps < .001).

Conclusions

Mindstreams was easily employed, including in patients with considerable cognitive impairment, supporting its practicality for in-office cognitive assessment of the elderly. The availability of such valid and practical assessment suggests the feasibility of integrating the technology within a clinical algorithm for improved detection of cognitive decline.

Keywords: Computerized cognitive assessment, Dementia, Early detection, Cognitive assessment, Usability, Neuropsychology, Neuropsychological testing, Clinical algorithm, Diagnosis, Cognitive, Memory, Mild cognitive impairment

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1552-5260(07)00656-5

doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2007.09.008

Alzheimer's & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer's Association
Volume 4, Issue 1 , Pages 14-21, January 2008